Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julia Jones vs Kimberly Birrell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jones vs Birrell analysis and find out who is favored!
Julia Jones vs Kimberly Birrell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jones 1 - 0 Birrell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jones has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Birrell has won 43.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jones, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Birrell has won 53.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jones has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Birrell has saved 56.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jones has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Birrell winning 57.14% (W/L 40/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jones has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 41/ 19), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Birrell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 145/ 114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jones winning 1 times and Birrell being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jones winning 2 and Birrell winning 1. The last match between Jones and Birrell was at the Port Pirie, 23-02-2016, First, Hard with Julia Jones getting the victory 6-2 1-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jones and Birrell have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jones winning 1 times and Birrell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jones winning 0, and Birrell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jones has played against opponents with an average rank of while Birrell has played against players with an average rank of 220.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jones has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Birrell has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jones has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Birrell has converted 43.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
423
High
30
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
136
Rank
100
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
62% (50-31)
Career Total W/L
54% (200-172)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (20-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$487,328
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Julia Jones vs Kimberly Birrell For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jones VS Birrell
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Julia Jones | Kimberly Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:0 | 2:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (73/96) | 71% (49/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (46/73) | 69% (34/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (9/23) | 40% (8/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (27/69) | 43% (41/96) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 1-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Julia Jones
Player
Kimberly Birrell
76%
(
73 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julia Jones | Kimberly Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (20/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (47/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (417/377) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 82% (9/2) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 61 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 171 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:54:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 229.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (1673/2596) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1062/1673) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (397/923) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (153/354) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (1220/2664) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (14/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (19/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 82% (17/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 18% (17/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (18/6) |
Julia Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Julia Jones
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
52%
(
45 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Montserrat Gonzalez
Player
Julia Jones
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
104)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
52%
(
59 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Julia Jones
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 0-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Kimberly Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-2 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
12
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
72%
(
79 of
109)
1st Serve %
82%
(
95 of
116)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
123
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Emily Appleton
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Destanee Aiava
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Zarina Diyas
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Jule Niemeier
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Sachia Vickery
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Marina Melnikova
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jones Vs Birrell Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jones are available here and Birrell photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Kimberly Birrell
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
